Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-free Latanoprost Eyedrops Compared with Preserved Prostaglandin Analogues in Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma

Article information

Abstract

Materials and Methods

This prospective, open-label, observational study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (NHIMC 2019-09-001-002). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before any study-related procedure.

From November 25, 2019, to November 24, 2020, POAG patients aged between 19 and 80 years who visited the secondary level eye care clinic were enrolled in the study. POAG was defined as a glaucoma with open anterior chamber angle with following characteristic features: typical glaucomatous change of optic disc, retinal nerve fiber layer defect, and corresponding glaucomatous visual field (VF) defect. Also, there should be no secondary cause of optic neuropathy. Glaucomatous VF defect was defined as 1) a cluster of 3 or more points with a probability <5% on the pattern deviation map in at least one hemifield, including at least one point with a probability of <1%, or 2) a pattern standard deviation with a probability of <5%, or 3) glaucoma hemifield test values outside the normal limits.

Inclusion criteria were 1) IOPs that remain stable below 21 mmHg with PGA use for 6 months, 2) a stable VF based on at least two reliable VF test performed within the last 6 months, 3) central corneal thickness within the range 500 to 580 μm, 4) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in both eyes is 20 / 80 or higher based on the Snellen vision chart, and 5) good drug compliance as defined as following at least 80% of the guidelines for use and frequency of eye drops.

Exclusion criteria were 1) previous history of primary angle-closure glaucoma, congenital glaucoma, secondary glaucoma due to trauma, inflammation, tumor, dense cataract, or drugs such as steroids, 2) previous history of acute angle-closure glaucoma, 3) BCVA in both eyes of less than 20 / 80 based on the Snellen vision chart, 4) clinical evidence of inflammation (in case of chronic intraocular inflammation or a history of intraocular inflammation within 3 months immediately prior to participation in the study), 5) use of contact lens, 6) abnormal corneal condition that could make it difficult to measure IOP, 7) central corneal thickness outside the 500 to 580 μm range, 8) history of surgery that affects dryness, such as refractive surgery and cataract surgery within the last 3 months, 9) history of punctal occlusion surgery or surgical plan during the clinical study, 10) hypersensitivity to PGAs such as allergic contact dermatitis, 11) use of any eyedrops for dry eye symptoms other than carboxymethyl cellulose during the study period or 12) conditions of the optic disc or visual field judged by the investigator JWP that PGAs alone is not sufficient (i.e., advanced cupping or significant deterioration of VF indices within 6 months).

At the baseline visit (D0), patients included in the study switched their medications from BAK-preserved PGAs to PF latanoprost (Xalost-S; Taejoon Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea). All subjects were instructed to administer one drop of PF latanoprost to the glaucoma eye once every evening. All patients instilled the eyedrop for 90 days and visited our clinic on the 45th and 90th day after participation (D45 and D90). At each visit (D0, D45, and D90), BCVA, IOP, conjunctival hyperemia, corneal and conjunctival staining, and tear break-up time (TBUT) were evaluated. All ophthalmic examinations were performed by two examiners, KL and SK, glaucoma specialists with considerable experience. In the case of disagreement between the two examiners’ evaluations, JWP made the final decision. A questionnaire on the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and ocular tolerability was administered at each visit. The VF test was performed on D0 and D90.

IOP was measured twice at each visit using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and the mean value was used for analysis. To reduce diurnal variation of IOP, patients were instructed to visit the hospital at the same time as their first visit. Conjunctival hyperemia was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 4 based on the Efron grading scale [10]. For corneal staining, the Oxford schema grading system was used under cobalt blue light after the instillation of fluorescein and scored from 0 to 3. Conjunctival staining was evaluated according to the National Eye Institute (NEI scale). After fluorescein staining, we divided the conjunctiva into six equal parts and graded each area by assigning a score from 0 to 3 [11]. The TBUT was measured by instilling a Fluorescein paper strip (FLUO 900; Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland) on the conjunctival sac, blinking for several seconds, and then measuring the time until the first defect of the fluorescent dye appeared in the dyed tear film layer under a cobalt blue light source [12].

The OSDI was composed of a total of 12 questions and the score given was directly proportional to the severity of the symptoms. OSDI was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 100 and classified as normal (0–12), minimal (13–22), moderate (23–32), and severe (33–100) [7]. For ocular tolerability evaluation, the severity of symptoms was evaluated by scoring from 0 to 3 for the following 8 symptoms: burning, stickiness, itching, sandiness, dryness, blurred vision, light sensitivity, and pain.

VF test was measured by the C24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm standard program using Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl-Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). The VF test was considered appropriate when the fixation loss was less than 20% and the false positive and false negative rates were less than 33%.

Data were analyzed using R software ver. 3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation, numbers, and percentages. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way random effects analysis of variance, followed by a pairwise Tukey’s post hoc test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Of the 30 patients included in this study, three were eliminated, two changed their mind and withdrew from the study, and one was eliminated owing to the addition of a different eye drop to treat dry eye disease. Before changing the eye drops, 16 patients (59.3%) were using bimatoprost (Lumigan; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA), nine patients (33.3%) were using latanoprost (Xalatan; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA), and two patients (7.4%) were using tafluprost (Taflotan; Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan). Sixteen (59.3%) were men with a mean age of 62.7 ± 7.7 years. Mean BCVA was 0.8 ± 0.2, and IOP was 14.0 ± 2.4 mmHg. The mean deviation of the Humphrey test was −4.7 ± 5.2 dB, and the pattern standard deviation was 5.3 ± 4.3 dB (Table 1).

Table 1

Clinical and demographic data of the patients (n = 27)

Objective assessments

Mean BCVA and IOP did not change significantly over 90 days after switching to PF latanoprost. Limbal conjunctival hyperemia was not significantly different from baseline, but bulbar conjunctival hyperemia significantly decreased after 90 days. Corneal/conjunctival disease was also significantly decreased. TBUT at D90 was not significantly different from TBUT (Table 2).

Table 2

Changes in BCVA, IOP, ocular surface parameters, TBUT, and visual field score after treatment with preservative-free latanoprost (n = 27)

Subjective assessments

After changing to PF latanoprost, the OSDI score showed a statistically significant decrease. In the evaluation of ocular tolerance, burning symptoms, and dryness were significantly decreased. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in stickiness, itchiness, blurred vision, foreign body sensation, light sensitivity, and pain, according to the presence or absence of preservatives (Table 3).

Table 3

Changes in OSDI and ocular tolerability score after treatment with preservative-free latanoprost (n = 27)

Post hoc analysis

We performed the post hoc tests for six parameters that showed significant differences before and 90 days after the change to PF latanoprost. Corneal staining, burning, and OSDI score decreased statistically significantly at day 45 after the change. On the other hand, there were no statistically significant differences in conjunctival hyperemia, conjunctival staining, and dryness at D45 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Results of the post-hoc analysis. Six parameters (A, bulbar injection; B, cornea stain; C, conjunctiva stain; D, ocular surface disease index [OSDI]; E, burning; F, dryness) showed significant differences 90 days after administration of the preservative-free latanoprost. Corneal staining, burning, and OSDI score were significantly improved 45 days after administration (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.015). On the other hand, there were no statistically significant differences in conjunctival hyperemia, conjunctival staining, and dryness 45 days after administration (p = 0.639, p = 0.852, p = 0.122). p-value: one-way random effects analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the stability and efficacy of PF latanoprost as a treatment for glaucoma. With the switch to PF latanoprost, IOP remained stable and ocular discomfort was significantly reduced.

The primary treatment for glaucoma is lowering IOP through anti-glaucoma eye drops. PGAs have the strongest IOP-lowering effect among anti-glaucoma eye drops, and patients are highly compliant as these drops need to be used only once daily [9]. PGAs include latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost, and they work by increasing the outflow of aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber. However, ocular surface tissues may be adversely affected by preservatives included in commercially available PGAs to inhibit the proliferation of microorganisms.

BAK, a representative preservative, is a weak base and has superior antibacterial properties by destroying the cell membrane of microorganisms more efficiently than other preservatives [13,14]. Owing to these properties, it has been commonly used in various eye drops. However, since it also has a high affinity for membrane proteins, long-term use may cause various ocular surface symptoms through chronic inflammation, inhibition of proliferation, and apoptosis of conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells. As a result, the patient’s quality of life and drug compliance may decrease, and surgical outcomes, such as cataract surgery or trabeculectomy, may be affected [15–17].

Therefore, there have been efforts to develop PF anti-glaucoma eye drops. In addition, studies comparing the effects of PF eye drops and conventional eye drops have been conducted in various countries [8,16,18–22]. In most studies, the effects of both eye-drops on IOP were similar, but PF eye drops tended to be more effective in reducing ocular surface symptoms and signs. In our study, IOP remained stable during the study period. Similar results have been reported by other researchers, except Garcia-Feijoo et al. [18], who reported that BAK-free travoprost was effective in lowering IOP compared to preserved bimatoprost or latanoprost.

Bulbar conjunctival hyperemia and corneal/conjunctival were found to improve by using PF eye drops in our study as well as in other studies. Our research team and Misiuk-Hojlo et al. [16] reported no improvement in tear breakdown time, while others reported significantly improved results [8,20,22]. The OSDI was significantly decreased in our study, and a previous study [20] presented similar results. The patients’ subjective assessments of tolerability improved in our study as well as in other studies [8,16,20–22]. In general, redness, burning/stinging, and foreign body sensation were significantly improved.

There are strengths and limitations to this study. This was a prospective study conducted on POAG patients, one of the common types of glaucoma in South Korea. As well as changes in visual acuity, IOP, and VF results, changes in various ocular surface symptoms and signs were also statistically analyzed. In addition, post hoc analysis was performed on the statistically significant results. That is, for signs or symptoms that were improved at 90 D after replacement of eyedrops, further analysis was performed to compare the degree of improvement at 45 D and 90 D. The other advantage of this paper is that studies on PF latanoprost have not yet been conducted in hospitals other than tertiary hospitals in South Korea. There are differences in the characteristics of glaucoma patients visiting primary and secondary hospitals and tertiary hospitals. That is, patients with stable course of glaucoma usually visit a primary or secondary hospital, and patients with advanced or rapidly progressing glaucoma visit a tertiary hospital. Since there are many glaucoma patients who have been treated at primary and secondary hospitals, our study is meaningful in showing the effectiveness of PF latanoprost in a community-centered medical environment.

The major limitation was that there was no control group that continuously used preserved PGAs. This may degrade the objectivity of evaluating the efficacy of eye drops. Second, due to the nature of the open-label study, both investigators and subjects were already aware of the efficacy of PF latanoprost. This could affect the judgment of the treatment effect and cause information bias. Third, since OSDI and ocular tolerability evaluation are somewhat subjective, the reliability of the study will be improved if objective assessments, such as the Schirmer test or LipiView, are additionally performed. Fourth, the number of study subjects was relatively small, and the study duration was rather short to assess long-term effects. Fifth, BAK-preserved PGAs previously used by patients in this study included latanoprost, bimatoprost and tafluprost. Since there are differences in components and BAK concentrations between eye drops, various factors other than BAK may be involved in improving ocular surface symptoms or signs. However, drug-specific comparison was not performed due to the small sample size. Lastly, since this study was targeted to patients who were already using PGAs, initial IOPs before using eyedrops were often not known. So, baseline IOPs were not included in the analysis. As further study, if comparative study is performed on newly diagnosed patients or after a washout period, it will be possible to analyze the difference in the effect of lowering IOP based on the initial IOP.

In conclusion, the effects of BAK-preserved PGAs and PF latanoprost on reducing IOP were comparable, but side effects on the ocular surface were much less when PF latanoprost was used. With this efficacy, PF latanoprost can slow the progression of glaucoma by increasing patient compliance and make it possible to treat many glaucoma patients, including glaucoma patients with ocular surface diseases.

Article information Continued